Liberals, Socialist, Commies, OH my !

Hold on there, I'm not saying you shouldn't be, or should be, however you 'float your boat' is still welcome here in America. Though it's a little 'hairy' right now, it's still free to be the way you are, as long as you're not strapping bombs around your waist in doing so, in making your point. But it's your point I want to get into with this hubpage.


As John Addams says here, and thankful to him and his kind, we all have our liberty to believe so, and however we believe, but not to be forced by government to believe a certain way, to endanger the public liberty.

Let me aqueous. I have a couple dating sites I frequent. No doubt it's the reason of my point here that I'm still single, but anyway. Many ladies are liberal, which is cool with me, I have no problem with that and would live with them. I have come across some, not many, that out-right call themselves socialist, and fewer yet that have called themselves communist. That later two here I would have trouble living with, not so much because of their belief but because of their hard-nosed aggressive attitude toward those who aren't of their political conviction. I have had to write them back continually to get an answer from them after they found out I was libertarian. I had to assure them I no longer would want to date them, just that I wanted an answer for the sake of this hubpage. Most never wrote back and blocked further mail from me. I found that odd and disturbing. These people come very close to the 'Taliban' way of thinking of forceful diplomacy. Not only do they think they are right, they don't want to talk to others that aren't or be anywhere close to bipartisan. Obviously, free and equal has left their being and they will have no part of it, even when it comes to just talking to another human being.

So, unless I'm not understanding them correctly, it means that liberals aren't really liberal by definition:

lib·er·al

/ˈlib(ə)rəl/ -Adjective; Open to new behavior or opinions and willing to discard traditional values. Noun - A person of liberal views. Synonyms -generous - bounteous - lavish - bountiful - free.
So Liberals are more like, or supposed to be more like Libertarians. Or what? Or has the truth of definitions gone out of style in the Clinton years? And so today liberalism has morphed into socialism because the people have just gotten so damn lazy of being accountable and living by the Golden Rule? I'm confused. Aren't they satisfied with living the way thy want in their own dwelling and now have to make others live the same way?

 


In America here we have all different kinds of people, and because it is America we are aloud to live the way we want as long as we don't harm another fellow human being. Which is cool, and I love it that way, and wish it was more so that way. Take for instance the recent legalization of marijuana in Colorado and Washington, as I wrote in, 'The Legalize Virus Escapes.' After this happened there are untold numbers of people and families moving to those states, even from out of the country, to either enjoy their partaking of the herb in peace and quiet and without the threat of being arrested, or to open up a business that is associated with this commodity. Much like what happened when gold was discovered in the area.

Taking this into consideration; and here comes my point: those people in this free country who enjoy being socialistic minded and partake of that lifestyle are free to do so. But if they like to live around more people who are like they are, and associate with more families and even a whole country that live the way they want to live, they have the choice to move to that Country. There are a few left like Cuba, China and even others who are still like that or very close to that. There are even places left in the World that have religious police on guard, they can move to to feel more comfortable and at home. Places that will kill you for being gay. Places that will kill you for being a drug addict. Places that will flog you for chewing gum in public or spitting on the street. Places that wont let you vote, and kill you if you even bring up the idea of freedom or social liberties.

There are alot of places for these people to choose from so they can 'float their kind of boat' to their heart's content. But no! No. I don't see any boat loads of these Liberals, Socialists, Commies leaving the shores of America for these other shores, so they can live the way they want in peace. No. Never have, never will. And here's my point; and ya know why? Because they are hippocrates and haven't got the balls to do the rational thing and move to that Country. They know full well, or rather 'fool well' if they were living in a socialist / Communist / Dictatorship country they wouldn't be aloud to do such a thing, as they do here in America. Their actions they partake here in America, wouldn't be tolerated one iota in those other countries. Instead of moving, these spineless leaches would rather live here in a free country and preach, protest, and be active in un-freedom-like propaganda movements. They would rather live here and be protected by a free country while they shout out their message to the contrary. They are instigators who try to spoil the God given freedoms and liberties the others here love, or have moved here to enjoy and prosper from.

"To deny these freedoms and Liberties to ourselves, and to others, is an unpardonable sin!" -JR Hager

LBN-INVESTIGATES: SHOCK POLL: 29% OF REGISTERED VOTERS BELIEVE ARMED REVOLUTION MIGHT BE NECESSARY IN NEXT FEW YEARS:

Twenty-nine percent of registered voters think that an armed revolution might be necessary in the next few years in order to protect liberties, according to a Public Mind poll by Fairleigh Dickinson University.
The poll, which surveyed 863 registered voters and had a margin of error of +/-3.4, focused on both gun control and the possibility of a need for an armed revolution in the United States to protect liberty.
The survey asked whether respondents agreed, disagreed, neither agreed nor disagreed or did not know or refused to respond to the statement: “In the next few years, an armed revolution might be necessary in order to protect our liberties”

~oh by the way

Biden: The last thing we need is another Ted Cruz or Rand Paul in the Senate:

“I’m not talking about the character or even the quality of the minds of the people I’m going to mention. But the last thing in the world we need now is someone who will go down to the United States Senate and support Ted Cruz, support the new senator from Kentucky,” Biden said referring to Sen. Rand Paul.

“Or the old senator from Kentucky,” he added, referring to Sen. Mitch McConnell.

for the rest of the article:
http://washingtonexaminer.com/biden-the-last-thing-we-need-is-another-ted-cruz-or-rand-paul-in-the-senate/article/2531684

• The Ugly Side of Socialism Is Here » Monty Pelerin's World
• Why Socialism is Bad for America | Todd Weber's Random ThoughtsSocialism...leads to large, intrusive and controlling government that diminishes the role and value of individual citizens; it is largely based on false compassion that promotes victimhood and big government; and it offers false hope of utopian broth
• Socialist medicine in decline: One quarter of all Canadian nurses say they wouldn't recommend their
• PrairiePundit: Socialism in decline in Europe
• Why Did the Socialist Party Decline? | Solidarity
•